Implementation of Entropy and Additive Ratio Assessment Methods in Determining the Best Warehouse Location


Authors

  • Muhammad Waqas Arshad University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Setiawansyah Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia, Bandarlampung, Indonesia
  • Mesran Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v4i4.360

Keywords:

ARAS Method; Determining; Entropy; Location; Warehouse

Abstract

The main problems in determining warehouse location include high operational costs, inadequate accessibility and infrastructure, and strict and complex local regulations. In addition, environmental risks and natural disasters, as well as economic fluctuations and market dynamics also add to the challenge of choosing an optimal location. The purpose of this study is to apply the Entropy and ARAS methods in evaluating the potential of optimal warehouse locations, thereby providing clear and structured guidance for decision-makers in choosing the optimal warehouse location to meet the company's operational and strategic needs. The implementation of the entropy and ARAS methods in determining the best warehouse location involves a systematic approach in evaluating several criteria that are important for optimal decision-making. The Entropy method helps in objectively assessing the importance of each criterion by quantifying the uncertainty or variation present in the data. The ARAS method complements this by allowing comparative analysis of alternative warehouse locations based on their performance against ideal criteria, taking into account both quantitative and qualitative aspects. Thus, both methods provide a solid framework for selecting warehouse locations that not only meet logistics requirements efficiently but are also in line with strategic business objectives, ensuring a well-informed decision-making process in supply chain management and logistics. The results of the ranking of the best warehouse location selection using the entropy and ARAS methods show AB Location as the first rank with a value of 0.9781, DD Location as the second place with a value of 0.8362, and IP Location as the third place with a value of 0.8143.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Baraily, R. K. Ghadai, S. Das, and R. Phipon, “Multi-objective optimization in MQCL turning of AISI 304 steel using MEREC, CODAS, ARAS and COPRAS method,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, 2023, vol. 2786, no. 1.

A. K. Ramezanali, F. Feizi, A. Jafarirad, and M. Lotfi, “Application of Best-Worst method and Additive Ratio Assessment in mineral prospectivity mapping: A case study of vein-type copper mineralization in the Kuhsiah-e-Urmak Area, Iran,” Ore Geol. Rev., vol. 117, p. 103268, 2020.

S. Sintaro, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Barista Terbaik Menggunakan Rank Sum dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” J. Ilm. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 39–49, 2023, doi: 10.58602/jics.v2i1.15.

S. H. Hadad, “Penerapan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Dalam Pemilihan Guru Terbaik,” Chain J. Comput. Technol. Comput. Eng. Informatics, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 170–178, 2023.

N. P. Dewi and E. Maharani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Sales Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) Berbasis Web,” Digit. Zo. J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 172–183, 2021.

A. Puška, A. Štili?, and I. Stojanovi?, “Approach for multi-criteria ranking of Balkan countries based on the index of economic freedom,” J. Decis. Anal. Intell. Comput., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.31181/jdaic10017022023p.

D. Xiong, C. He, X. Liu, and M. Liao, “An End-To-End Bayesian Segmentation Network Based on a Generative Adversarial Network for Remote Sensing Images,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 2. MDPI AG, p. 216, 2020. doi: 10.3390/rs12020216.

A. I. Petrov, “Entropy Method of Road Safety Management: Case Study of the Russian Federation,” Entropy, vol. 24, no. 2, p. 177, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/e24020177.

S. J. Siriyapuraju, V. S. Gowri, S. Balla, M. K. Vanika, and A. Gandhi, “DoS and DDoS attack detection using Mathematical and Entropy Methods,” in 2023 2nd International Conference on Paradigm Shifts in Communications Embedded Systems, Machine Learning and Signal Processing (PCEMS), Apr. 2023, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/PCEMS58491.2023.10136042.

L. Fan, X. Zhong, J. Chen, Y. Tu, and J. Jiang, “Comprehensive Energy System Evaluation Method of Low-carbon Park Based on Improved Entropy Weight,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 2418, no. 1, p. 012025, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2418/1/012025.

L. Chen and Y. Deng, “Entropy of Random Permutation Set,” Commun. Stat. - Theory Methods, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 4127–4146, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1080/03610926.2023.2173975.

S. ?? Zhang ?, X. ?? Wang ?, T. ? Lin ?, and L. ? Chang ?, “Reconstructing parton distribution function based on maximum entropy method,” Chinese Phys. C, vol. 48, no. 3, p. 033106, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/ad1b3d.

D. D. Trung and H. X. Thinh, “A multi-criteria decision-making in turning process using the MAIRCA, EAMR, MARCOS and TOPSIS methods: A comparative study,” Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 443–456, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.14743/apem2021.4.412.

A. D. Wahyudi, “Penentuan Lokasi Gudang Baru Menggunakan TOPSIS dan Pembobotan PIPRECIA,” J. Inf. Technol. Softw. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 22–30, 2024.

A. A. I. Azis and Z. Abidin, “Analisis penentuan lokasi gudang pada toko dhiza petshop menggunakan metode weight product,” J. Ilmu Manaj. Mulawarman, vol. 8, no. 1, 2023.

A. A. Shavira, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Lokasi Gudang dengan Metode Vikor Pada PT. ABC,” SISFOTENIKA, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 151–161, 2023.

F. R. Naibaho, “Comparison between SAW and WASPAS Methods in Determining the Location of the Transit Warehouse of PT. TG,” J. Informatics Telecommun. Eng., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 393–403, 2021.

H. Sulistiani, Setiawansyah, P. Palupiningsih, F. Hamidy, P. L. Sari, and Y. Khairunnisa, “Employee Performance Evaluation Using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT) with PIPRECIA-S Weighting: A Case Study in Education Institution,” in 2023 International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Informations System (ICIMCIS), 2023, pp. 369–373. doi: 10.1109/ICIMCIS60089.2023.10349017.

E. R. Susanto, A. Savitri Puspaningrum, and Z. Abidin, “Recommendations of Cash Social Assistance (BST) Recipients for People Affected by Covid-19 Using AHP-TOPSIS,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), Aug. 2023, pp. 190–195. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10326776.

Setiawansyah, A. A. Aldino, P. Palupiningsih, G. F. Laxmi, E. D. Mega, and I. Septiana, “Determining Best Graduates Using TOPSIS with Surrogate Weighting Procedures Approach,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), 2023, pp. 60–64. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327119.

M. Mesran, M. Kom, J. H. Lubis, and I. F. Rahmad, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basic of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) dalam Keputusan Penerimaan Siswa Baru,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2022.

W. I. Safitri, M. Mesran, and S. Sarwandi, “Penerapan Metode Preference Selection Index (PSI) Dalam Penerimaan Staff IT,” Bull. Informatics Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 1, May 2022, doi: 10.61944/bids.v1i1.1.

E. Pranita, J. P. Sembiring, A. Jayadi, N. U. Putri, A. Jaenul, and A. M. Fathurahman, “Melinjo Chip Dryer Monitoring System Using Fuzzy Logic Method,” in 2023 International Conference on Networking, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, and Technology (IConNECT), Aug. 2023, pp. 98–102. doi: 10.1109/IConNECT56593.2023.10327339.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Implementation of Entropy and Additive Ratio Assessment Methods in Determining the Best Warehouse Location

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2024-06-30

Abstract View: 109 times
PDF Download: 101 times

How to Cite

Waqas Arshad, M., Setiawansyah, & Mesran. (2024). Implementation of Entropy and Additive Ratio Assessment Methods in Determining the Best Warehouse Location. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 4(4), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v4i4.360

Issue

Section

Articles