Analisis Komparatif Decision Tree C4.5 dan Neural Network pada Prediksi Kanker Payudara


Authors

  • Amali Amali Universitas Pelita Bangsa, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Edy Widodo Universitas Pelita Bangsa, Bekasi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v4i5.295

Keywords:

Breast Cancer; Classification; Decision Tree C4.5; Neural Network; ROC Curve; Rapidminer

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the diseases with the highest incidence and mortality rates among women, requiring methods that can support fast and accurate detection. This study aims to compare the performance of the Decision Tree C4.5 and Neural Network algorithms in breast cancer classification using the Breast Cancer Wisconsin dataset obtained from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. The research method adopts the CRISP-DM approach, which includes data collection, preprocessing, model development, testing, and evaluation stages. The preprocessing stage was carried out through data cleaning, data transformation, and data reduction to improve dataset quality before the modeling process. The testing process used split validation and evaluation based on accuracy, precision, recall, and Area Under Curve (AUC) metrics. The results indicate that the Neural Network algorithm achieved better performance than Decision Tree C4.5. Neural Network obtained an accuracy of 96.17%, precision of 95.80%, recall of 96.50%, and an AUC value of 0.989, which is categorized as excellent classification. Meanwhile, Decision Tree C4.5 achieved an accuracy of 93.50% and an AUC value of 0.945, categorized as very good classification. ROC Curve analysis demonstrates that Neural Network is more effective in distinguishing benign and malignant classes. Therefore, Neural Network is recommended as the best model to support early breast cancer detection based on machine learning, while Decision Tree C4.5 remains relevant for conditions requiring simpler and more interpretable models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. F. Rahmadini, R. K. D.S, and T. Agustiani, “Edukasi Perilaku Pemeriksaan Payudara Sendiri (Sadari) Dalam Pencegahan Kanker Payudara Pada Remaja,” Jurnal Pemberdayaan dan Pendidikan Kesehatan (JPPK), vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 105–113, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.34305/jppk.v1i02.433.

A. Rizka, M. K. Akbar, and N. A. Putri, “Carcinoma Mammae Sinistra T4bN2M1 Metastasis Pleura,” AVERROUS: Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Malikussaleh, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 23–31, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.29103/averrous.v8i1.7006.

A. Supriyanto, W. A. Kusuma, and H. Rahmawan, “Klasifikasi Kanker Tumor Payudara Menggunakan Arsitektur Inception-V3 Dan Algoritma Machine Learning,” JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 187, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.36722/sst.v7i3.1284.

C. Sidrah Nadira, A. Rizka, and Z. Humaira, “Faktor Keterlambatan Pada Pasien Kanker Payudara Yang Berobat Di Rsucm Aceh Utara Tahun 2020 - 2021,” Jurnal Ilmiah Manusia Dan Kesehatan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 88–99, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.31850/makes.v6i1.1942.

L. Schwartzberg et al., “Impact of early detection on cancer curability: A modified Delphi panel study,” PLoS One, vol. 17, no. 12, p. e0279227, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279227.

M. Wojtara, E. Rana, T. Rahman, P. Khanna, and H. Singh, “Artificial intelligence in rare disease diagnosis and treatment,” Clin. Transl. Sci., vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2106–2111, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1111/cts.13619.

F. D. Telaumbanua, P. Hulu, T. Z. Nadeak, R. R. Lumbantong, and A. Dharma, “Penggunaan Machine Learning Di Bidang Kesehatan,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Ilmu Komputer Prima (JUTIKOMP), vol. 2, no. 2, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.34012/jutikomp.v2i2.657.

Cecep Wahyu Cahyana and Akhsin Nurlayli, “Analisis Performa Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes, dan Random Forest sebagai Algoritma Pendeteksi Kanker Payudara,” INSERT?: Information System and Emerging Technology Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–64, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.23887/insert.v4i1.62362.

A. A. Lemij et al., “Breast cancer in the older population: a global challenge—an epidemiological perspective,” Annals of Breast Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 17–17, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.21037/abs-21-89.

R. Resmiati and T. Arifin, “Klasifikasi Pasien Kanker Payudara Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine dengan Backward Elimination,” SISTEMASI, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 381, May 2021, doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v10i2.1238.

M. Mustapha, D. Ozsahin, I. Ozsahin, and B. Uzun, “Breast Cancer Screening Based on Supervised Learning and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making,” Diagnostics, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 1326, May 2022, doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061326.

N. R. Muntiari and K. H. Hanif, “Klasifikasi Penyakit Kanker Payudara Menggunakan Perbandingan Algoritma Machine Learning,” Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–6, May 2022, doi: 10.35960/ikomti.v3i1.766.

W. Gautama, “Breast Cancer in Indonesia in 2022: 30 Years of Marching in Place,” Indonesian Journal of Cancer, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 1, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.33371/ijoc.v16i1.920.

R. Resmiati and T. Arifin, “Klasifikasi Pasien Kanker Payudara Menggunakan Metode Support Vector Machine dengan Backward Elimination,” SISTEMASI, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 381, May 2021, doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v10i2.1238.

S. Hannan, I. Hami, R. K. Dey, and S. Das Gupta, “A Systematic Exploration of Key Candidate Genes and Pathways in the Biogenesis of Human Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Bioinformatics Investigation,” Journal of Translational Gastroenterology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–20, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.14218/JTG.2023.00072.

N. Sakhare, Y. Rewatkar, J. Khalatkar, S. Uplapwar, N. Parate, and Y. Dubey, “Performance Evaluation of Predictive Models for Breast Cancer Classification,” in 2022 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Medical Sciences (ICETEMS), IEEE, Nov. 2022, pp. 312–316. doi: 10.1109/ICETEMS56252.2022.10093543.

R. Nurcahyo, A. Z. Fanani, A. Affandy, and M. I. Aziz, “Peningkatan Algoritma C4.5 Berbasis PSO Pada Penyakit Kanker Payudara,” JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 1758, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i4.6841.

A. Nanda and A. Jatain, “Analysis of Breast Cancer Detection Techniques Using RapidMiner,” 2021, pp. 3–14. doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-4992-2_1.

F. M. Hana, “Klasifikasi Penderita Penyakit Diabetes Menggunakan Algoritma Decision Tree C4.5,” Jurnal SISKOM-KB (Sistem Komputer dan Kecerdasan Buatan), vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 32–39, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.47970/siskom-kb.v4i1.173.

R. Nurcahyo, A. Z. Fanani, A. Affandy, and M. I. Aziz, “Peningkatan Algoritma C4.5 Berbasis PSO Pada Penyakit Kanker Payudara,” JURNAL MEDIA INFORMATIKA BUDIDARMA, vol. 7, no. 4, p. 1758, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.30865/mib.v7i4.6841.

V. Jaiswal, P. Saurabh, U. K. Lilhore, M. Pathak, S. Simaiya, and S. Dalal, “A breast cancer risk predication and classification model with ensemble learning and big data fusion,” Decision Analytics Journal, vol. 8, p. 100298, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100298.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Analisis Komparatif Decision Tree C4.5 dan Neural Network pada Prediksi Kanker Payudara

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2024-08-30

Abstract View: 12 times
PDF Download: 3 times

How to Cite

Amali, A., & Widodo, E. (2024). Analisis Komparatif Decision Tree C4.5 dan Neural Network pada Prediksi Kanker Payudara. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 4(5), 408-417. https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v4i5.295

Issue

Section

Articles