Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Peringatan Dini Kualitas Udara Yogyakarta Berbasis LSTM, SHAP, dan Fuzzy Tsukamoto


Authors

  • Zakki Farian Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Sleman, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Fadly Pradana Putra Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Sleman, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Shiddqi Al Ghiffari Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Sleman, Indonesia
  • Rifki Aditiya Pratama Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Sleman, Indonesia
  • Fadil Indra Sanjaya Universitas Teknologi Yogyakarta, Sleman, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v6i6.1170

Keywords:

Air Quality; Early Warning; Fuzzy Tsukamoto; Multi-Output LSTM; SHAP

Abstract

The escalating urban air pollution in Yogyakarta City, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), demands an air quality monitoring system that is not merely reactive, but predictive and capable of guiding public policy mitigation. This research proposes an early warning Decision Support System (DSS) for air quality by integrating Multi-Output Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) using SHapley Additive exPlanations  (SHAP), and Tsukamoto Fuzzy Logic. The Multi-Output LSTM network simultaneously forecasts six Air Pollutant Standard Index (ISPU) parameters based on historical sequences from the Air Quality Monitoring System (AQMS) station during 2021–2024. The SHAP method dismantles the black-box nature of the neural network to uncover atmospheric causality dynamics, while the Tsukamoto Fuzzy inference engine transforms raw numerical predictions into hazard alert levels and structured public health recommendations. Forecasting evaluation demonstrates high model accuracy, achieving Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) metrics of 4.82 for SO2, 1.86 for CO, 6.48 for PM10, 9.50 for PM2.5, 7.33 for O3, and 11.55 for NO2. SHAP feature attribution validated via statistical cross-correlation analysis confirms that PM2.5 concentration surges are significantly driven by precursor NO2 emissions with a 1-to-2-day lag (r = 0.2701, p < 0.001) through secondary photochemical reactions. DSS testing across six extreme weather scenarios proves the adaptive capability of the system in delivering proportional alerts. However, the system exhibits limitations including reliance on a single monitoring station and stochastic meteorological uncertainty requiring careful policy calibration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z. Jilan Azizah and K. S. Lestari, “Gambaran Umum Kualitas Udara Berdasarkan Indeks Standar Pemantauan Udara Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo,” J. Kesehat. Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1877–1884, 2026, doi: 10.31004/jkt.v7i1.56764.

A. N. Fachmi, F. N. Hasan, A. D. Permatasari, F. R. Ramadhan, R. D. Patria, and S. R. R. Pudjiati, “Analisis Klasifikasi Indeks Standar Pencemaran Udara Jakarta Tahun 2025 Menggunakan Algoritma Random Forest,” J. Inform. Dan Tek. Elektro Terap., 2026, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:284865488

Nafas Foundation, “Air Quality Retrospective 2023,” Nafas Foundation, Jakarta, Indonesia, Dec. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://nafas.co.id/nafas-buka-data

T. Li et al., “Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Cardiopulmonary Health Risks in China,” Chin. Med. J. (Engl.), vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 287–294, 2023, doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002218.

Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Kota Yogyakarta, “Laporan Analisis Hasil Pemantauan Kualitas Udara Ambien Kota Yogyakarta Tahun 2023,” Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Annual Report, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://lingkunganhidup.jogjakota.go.id/page/index/basis-data-lingkungan-hidup

M. Z. Wicaksono and L. E. Astrianty, “Sistem Prediksi Kualitas Udara Menggunakan Algoritma Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 831–840, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.47065/tin.v6i7.8619.

F. Supriyatna and Y. Yuliazmi, “Penerapan K-Means Untuk Clustering Data Indeks Standar Pencemaran Udara Di Kota Yogyakarta,” Telematika MKOM, vol. 17, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.36080/telematikamkom.4032.

S. Shinzi, V. P. Sientika, and T. Handhayani, “Prediksi Indeks Standar Pencemaran Udara di Kota Yogyakarta dengan Model Long Short-Term Memory dan Gated Recurrent Unit,” JATI J. Mhs. Tek. Inform., vol. 9, no. 5, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.36040/jati.v9i5.15210.

S. Kim et al., “Explainable AI-driven high-fidelity IAQ prediction (HiFi-IAQ) model for subway stations: Spatiotemporal outdoor air quality interpolation using geographic data,” Build. Environ., vol. 263, p. 111906, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111906.

B. Sahoh and A. Choksuriwong, “The Role of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in High-Stakes Decision-Making Systems: A Systematic Review,” J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., vol. 14, pp. 7827–7843, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12652-023-04594-w.

Z.-A. Xie, C.-O. Chow, J. H. Chuah, and W. J. K. Raymond, “Multi-Pollutant Air Quality Forecasting Using Bidirectional Attention And Multi-Scale Temporal Networks,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. Volume 13-2025, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2025.1623630.

Z. Liu, Z. Fang, and Y. Hu, “A Deep Learning-Based Hybrid Method For PM2.5 Prediction In Central And Western China,” Sci. Rep., vol. 15, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95460-6.

Dr. T. Vengatesh et al., “Explainable AI For Environmental Decision Support: Interpreting Deep Learning Models In Climate Science,” Int. J. Environ. Sci., pp. 1078–1088, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.64252/h6ng2f46.

D. P. Alamsyah, Y. Ramdhani, and R. D. Nurbeni, “Implementation of the Fuzzy Inference System Tsukamoto Method in the Decision Support System,” in 2022 International Symposium on Electronics and Smart Devices (ISESD), 2022, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ISESD56103.2022.9980745.

A. Michalíková, “Explanation of Air Quality Data Using Takagi–Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 7, p. 3461, 2025, doi: 10.3390/app15073461.

A. E. Putra and T. Rismawan, “Klasifikasi Kualitas Udara Berdasarkan Indeks Standar Pencemaran Udara (ISPU) Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Tsukamoto,” Coding J. Komput. Dan Apl., vol. 11, no. 2, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.26418/coding.v11i2.58704.

V. Hua, T. Nguyen, M.-S. Dao, H. D. Nguyen, and B. T. Nguyen, “The Impact of Data Imputation on Air Quality Prediction Problem,” PLoS ONE, vol. 19, no. 9, p. e0306303, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306303.

A. Pranolo et al., “Enhanced Multivariate Time Series Analysis Using LSTM: A Comparative Study of Min-Max and Z-Score Normalization Techniques,” Ilk. J. Ilm., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 210–220, 2024, doi: 10.33096/ilkom.v16i2.2333.210-220.

S. Hochreiter and J. Schmidhuber, “Long Short-Term Memory,” Neural Comput., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1735–1780, Nov. 1997, doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.

P. B. Weerakody, K. W. Wong, and G. Wang, “Policy Gradient Empowered LSTM With Dynamic Skips For Irregular Time Series Data,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 142, p. 110314, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110314.

Y. O. Hodlevskyi and T. A. Vakaliuk, “Optimal Gradient Descent Algorithm for LSTM Neural Network Learning,” in 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), May 2024, pp. 245–249. doi: 10.1109/SIST61555.2024.10629398.

L. S. Shapley, “Contributions to the Theory of Games, Volume II,” H. W. Kuhn and A. W. Tucker, Eds., Princeton University Press, 1953, pp. 307–318. doi: 10.1515/9781400881970-018.

S. Lundberg and S.-I. Lee, “A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions.” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874

Mushliha and Nisrinah, “Evaluation of ARIMA, ARIMA-LSTM, LSTM, and CNN-LSTM Models for Daily Air Quality Index Forecasting in Jakarta,” J. IDEALIS, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 214–223, Jul. 2026, doi: 10.36080/idealis.v9i2.3799.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Peringatan Dini Kualitas Udara Yogyakarta Berbasis LSTM, SHAP, dan Fuzzy Tsukamoto

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2026-10-13

Abstract View: 0 times
PDF Download: 0 times

How to Cite

Farian, Z., Putra, M. F. P., Al Ghiffari, M. S., Pratama, R. A., & Sanjaya, F. I. (2026). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Peringatan Dini Kualitas Udara Yogyakarta Berbasis LSTM, SHAP, dan Fuzzy Tsukamoto. Bulletin of Computer Science Research, 6(6), 2457-2468. https://doi.org/10.47065/bulletincsr.v6i6.1170

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)