Perbandingan Metodologi SDLC Waterfall dan Agile Dalam Rencana Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Kepatuhan


Authors

  • Irfan Burhani Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer Mercusuar, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Juwari Juwari Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer Mercusuar, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Soderi Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer Mercusuar, Bekasi, Indonesia
  • Karno Diantoro Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer Mercusuar, Bekasi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/jimat.v5i2.489

Keywords:

Compliance Information System; SDLC; Waterfall; Agile

Abstract

The development of compliance information systems plays a strategic role in the banking industry, particularly in ensuring that every operational activity adheres to continuously evolving regulations. Bank Syariah Indonesia faces challenges in determining the most effective and efficient system development methodology to be applied in developing compliance information systems. This study aims to compare two system development methodologies: Waterfall and Agile. A qualitative approach was used, with data collected through interviews and questionnaires distributed to 60 respondents, determined using the Slovin formula with a 2% margin of error. The results show that 83% of respondents consider the Agile method to be more flexible in responding to regulatory changes due to its iterative nature, ability to adjust backlogs, and open team communication. On the other hand, Waterfall is still considered relevant for projects that require detailed documentation and a strict structure. The main weakness of Waterfall lies in its limited ability to adapt to changes that arise at the end of the development cycle. This study recommends a Hybrid approach that combines the flexibility of Agile and the structured nature of Waterfall, to ensure the development of compliance information systems that are adaptive, well-documented, and aligned with complex and dynamic regulatory requirements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. N. Timur, S. P. Arso, and M. H. Ardani, “Sistem Informasi Pencegahan Pasien Jatuh (Sipenja) Untuk Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Perawat Dalam Pencegahan Pasien Jatuh?: Pilot Study,” J. Ilm. Kesehat., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 69–74, 2020, doi: 10.48144/jiks.v13i2.253.

N. Lutfiani, P. Harahap, Q. Aini, A. Dimas, A. R. Ahmad, and U. Rahardja, “Inovasi Manajemen Proyek I-Learning Menggunakan Metode Agile Scrumban,” InfoTekJar J. Nas. Inform. dan Teknol. Jar., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 96–101, 2020.

M. R. Maulana, E. D. Wahyuni, T. Informatika, F. Teknik, and U. M. Malang, “EVALUASI METODOLOGI WATERFALL DAN AGILE?:,” vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1287–1294.

D. Murdiani and M. Sobirin, “Perbandingan Metodologi Waterfall Dan RAD Dalam Pengembangan Sistem Informasi,” JINTEKS (Jurnal Inform. Teknol. dan Sains), vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 302–306, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://www.jurnal.uts.ac.id/index.php/JINTEKS/article/view/2008

A. A. Arsyad, M. Mashud, and A. Sumardin, “Implementasi Metode Agile Scrum Pada Sistem Informasi Akuntasi CV Tritama Inti Persada,” J. Ilm. Sist. Inf. Akunt., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 82–87, 2022, doi: 10.33365/jimasia.v2i2.2241.

T. Thesing, C. Feldmann, and M. Burchardt, “Agile versus waterfall project management: decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 181, pp. 746–756, 2021.

U. S. Senarath, “Waterfall methodology, prototyping and agile development,” Tech. Rep., pp. 1–16, 2021.

A. A. Wahid, “‘Analisis Metode Waterfall Untuk Pengembangan Sistem Informasi,’ ,” J. Ilmu-ilmu Inform. dan Manaj. STMIK, vol. 1, no. October, 2020.

Windari, V. Aprelia, Putra, and D. Iskandar, “Perbandingan Metodologi Waterfall dan Agile Dalam Pengembangan Aplikasi,” Teknol. Inf. Univ. AMIKOM Yogyakarta, pp. 1–6, 2023.

Z. Ramadhan, “Mengoptimalkan pengembangan aplikasi mobile melalui perbandingan metode pengembangan perangkat lunak (Waterfall, Prototype, Mobile-D, Agile, RAD),” SUBMIT J. Ilm. Teknol. Infomasi Dan Sains, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 13–19, 2023.

N. Zefania, “Analisis Perbandingan Metodologi untuk Manajemen Proyek: Agile dan Waterfall,” no. July 2022, 2024, doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22828.27528.

N. Hidayati, “Penggunaan Metode Waterfall Dalam Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Penjualan,” Gener. J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://ojs.unpkediri.ac.id/index.php/gj/article/view/12642

S. H. Nova, A. P. Widodo, and B. Warsito, “Analisis Metode Agile pada Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Berbasis Website: Systematic Literature Review,” Techno.Com, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 139–148, 2022, doi: 10.33633/tc.v21i1.5659.

I. Larasati, A. N. Yusril, and P. Al Zukri, “Systematic Literature Review Analisis Metode Agile Dalam Pengembangan Aplikasi Mobile,” Sistemasi, vol. 10, no. 2, p. 369, 2021, doi: 10.32520/stmsi.v10i2.1237.

D. Oktavianingrum, “Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Informasi Online E-Samsat Jabar Rendra Trisyanto Surya Yeti Apriliawati Politeknik Negeri Bandung (D4-Akuntansi Manajemen Pemerintahan/Akuntansi),” Indones. Account. Res. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 244–252, 2021.

Y. M. A. Y. J. L. GAOL, “Sistem informasi akuntansi,” Circ. Arch., vol. 1, no. 1, 2023.

F. Zamzami, N. D. Nusa, and I. A. Faiz, Sistem informasi akuntansi. Ugm Press, 2021.

L. T. Khoza and C. Marnewick, “Waterfall and agile information system project success rates-a South African perspective,” South African Comput. J., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 43–73, 2020.

B.-A. Andrei, A.-C. Casu-Pop, S.-C. Gheorghe, and C.-A. Boiangiu, “A study on using waterfall and agile methods in software project management,” J. Inf. Syst. Oper. Manag., pp. 125–135, 2019.

D. T. Haniva, J. A. Ramadhan, and A. Suharso, “Systematic Literature Review Penggunaan Metodologi Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Waterfall, Agile, dan Hybrid,” JIEET (Journal Inf. Eng. Educ. Technol., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 36–42, 2023.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Perbandingan Metodologi SDLC Waterfall dan Agile Dalam Rencana Pengembangan Sistem Informasi Kepatuhan

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Published: 2025-04-30

Abstract View: 121 times
PDF Download: 124 times

Issue

Section

Articles