Penerapan Metode MOOSRA dan ROC dalam Penentuan Guru Terbaik


Authors

  • Nazrul Azizi Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Bella Putri Cahyani Universitas Budi Darma, Medan, Indonesia
  • Hetty Rohayani Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Jasmir Universitas Dinamika Bangsa, Jambi, Indonesia
  • Yuwan Jumaryadi Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Jeperson Hutahaean Sekolah Tinggi Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer (STMIK) Royal, Kisaran, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47065/jimat.v3i2.255

Keywords:

Decision Support System; Moosra Method; ROC Method; Best Teacher

Abstract

The best teacher is a teacher who is given appreciation because he has a high achievement value. There are several specific criteria in selecting the best teacher, namely in terms of achievement, skills possessed, morals/manners, and discipline. To improve quality in the world of education, of course, a teacher is needed who will interact directly with students in the learning process which can indirectly improve the quality of education. With the interaction in the learning process, it is hoped that it will become a resource in improving the quality of education. There is also something the government is doing that is in a way to advance education, namely by empowering teachers and giving an award, especially for those who are entitled to get the title of the best teacher with achievements. Based on the results of interviews and research related to SMK Negeri 2 Medan, in determining the best teacher the assessment is still in a subjective way. This is based only on the opinion of each teacher and does not start with certain criteria, this will affect social events because the method used is not in an objective way and ends in an unfair feeling caused by subjective methods among fellow teachers who teach at the school. Therefore, it is recommended that schools must determine and agree on certain criteria in determining outstanding teachers, even though the assessment in the final process is still carried out by voting from those who have voting rights in determining the outstanding/best teachers, which of course is also carried out by teachers. The system for determining the best teacher is always a problem every year because it can create injustice among fellow teachers. Therefore, to facilitate and eliminate this unfair attitude, a decision support system (SPK) is needed which can facilitate the determination of the best teacher at SMK Negeri 2 Medan. A decision support system is an interactive computer system that can assist decision making by utilizing existing data to solve unstructured and semi-structured problems. In this SPK there are several methods, one of which is the Moosra Method (Multiobjective Optimization on the Basis of Simple Ratio Analysis) and the ROC (Rank Order Centroid) Method. The result of ROC and MOOSRA method calculation showed that Halimah (A10) obtained the highest final preference value of 14.599, making her selected as the best teacher.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Hamid, “Guru Professional,” Al-Falah J. Ilm. Keislam. dan Kemasyarakatan, vol. 17, no. 32, pp. 274–275, 2017.

O. S. Seni, “Kepemimpinan Pendidikan Di Sekolah,” Atma Reksa J. Pastor. dan Kateketik, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 25, 2021, doi: 10.53949/ar.v5i2.119.

J. Helmi, “Membangun profesionalitas guru,” Education, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 319–336, 2015.

J. Afriany, K. Tampubolon, and R. Fadillah, “Penerapan Metode TOPSIS Penentuan Pemberian Mikro Faedah Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI),” TIN Terap. Inform. Nusant., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 129–137, 2021.

M. Syafrizal, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan (Decision Support System) Melwin Syafrizal Dosen STMIK AMIKOM Yogyakarta,” J. Dasi, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 77–90, 2010.

H. T. Sihotang and M. S. Siboro, “Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Siswa,” JIPN (Journal Informatics Pelita Nusantara), vol. 1, no. October 2016, 2016.

Z. M. Arini, D. J. Sitanggang, M. Ali, and S. Aripin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Facial Wash Terbaik yang digunakan pada kulit berminyak dengan menggunakan Metode Multi Attribute Utility Theory ( MAUT ) dan Pembobotan Rank Order Centroid ( ROC ),” pp. 317–324, 2022.

F. Saidah, N. Hasibuan, and E. Pratiwi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerapan Metode MOOSRA Rekrutmen PPNPN Pada Kantor Pertanahan Kota Medan,” SNASTIKOM, vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 89–97, 2022.

P. M. Sitanggang and K. Siregar, “Analisis Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA Dalam Pemilihan Peserta Olimpiade Matematika,” Resolusi Rekayasa Tek. Inform. dan Inf., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–16, 2022.

N. Astiani, D. Andreswari, and Y. Setiawan, “Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Tanaman Obat Herbal Untuk Berbagai Penyakit Dengan Metode Roc (Rank Order Centroid) Dan Metode Oreste Berbasis Mobile Web,” J. Inform., vol. 12, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.21460/inf.2016.122.486.

M. Mesran, J. Afriany, and S. H. Sahir, “Efektifitas Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dalam Peningkatan Motivasi Kerja Menerapkan Metode Rank Order Centroid (ROC) dan Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS),” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Riset Information Science (SENARIS), 2019, vol. 1, pp. 813–821.

A. Triayudi and J. D. Rajagukguk, “Implementasi Metode MAUT Dalam Menentukan Prioritas Produk Unggulan Daerah Dengan Menerapkan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 3, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v3i4.2216.

A. S. Nadeak, “Implementasi Ahp Dan Moosra Pemilihan Kasir Terbaik (Studi Kasus: Suzuya Departement Store),” Pelita Inform. Inf. dan Inform., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 189–196, 2021.

H. Haeruddin, “Pemilihan Peserta Olimpiade Matematika Menggunakan Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 489–494, 2022.

F. Meilida, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Atlet Pon Cabang Pencak Silat Menerapkan MOOSRA,” Bull. Comput. Sci. Res., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 93–100, 2021.

P. Kepemimpinan, D. A. N. Pemberdayaan, and D. K. Sintaasih, “MOTIVASI DAN KINERJA PEGAWAI Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana ( Unud ), Bali , Indonesia Email?: nana_anuraga@yahoo.com ABSTRAK PENDAHULUAN Sumber daya manusia dapat mempengaruhi keberhasilan suatu organisasi . Dalam era globalisasi , kemam,” vol. 9, pp. 3291–3324, 2017.

S. Suharni, “Upaya Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa,” G-Couns J. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 172–184, 2021, doi: 10.31316/g.couns.v6i1.2198.

J. Wijayanto and S. Juanita, “Pemodelan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Terbaik Sma Yp-Bdn Menggunakan Ahp Dan Saw,” IDEALIS Indones. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 98–106, 2021.

A. S. Nadeak, “Penerapan Metode Aras (Additive Ratio Assessment) Dalam Penilaian Guru Terbaik,” in Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS), 2019, vol. 1, no. 1.

Kusrini, Konsep Dan Aplikasi Pemdukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2007.

M. Yanto, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dalam Seleksi Produk,” J. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf. Bisnis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 167–174, 2021.

K. Kusmanto, M. B. K. Nasution, S. Suryadi, and A. Karim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Rekomendasi Kelayakan nasabah Penerima Kredit Menerapkan Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA,” Build. Informatics, Technol. Sci., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1284–1292, 2022.

E. Fitria, D. Suhaedi, and G. Gunawan, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan E-commerce dalam Pembelian Produk Fashion,” in Bandung Conference Series: Mathematics, 2023, vol. 3, no. 1.

M. A. Abdullah and R. T. Aldisa, “Penerapan Metode MOOSRA Dalam Penentuan Penerimaan Frontliner Menggunakan Pembobotan Metode ROC,” JURIKOM (Jurnal Ris. Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 330–337, 2023.

M. Faiz Zamzah Amirillah Hasibuan and M. Sianturi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kerjasama Wedding Organizer Dengan Menerapkan Metode ROC Dan WASPAS,” KLIK Kaji. Ilm. Inform. dan Komput., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 234–241, 2022, doi: 10.30865/klik.v2i6.374.

F. Aditiya and M. Mesran, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Calon Peserta Cerdas Cermat Tingkat SMA Menerapkan Metode ROC dan WP,” J. Ris. Tek. Inform. dan Data Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2022.

R. Khalida, B. Bangun, M. Mesran, and N. Oktari, “Penerapan Metode ROC dan Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assesment (WASPAS) dalam Penerimaan Asisten Perkebunan,” J. MEDIA Inform. BUDIDARMA, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 937–944, 2021.

A. Yunaldi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Bantuan Siswa Miskin Menerapkan Kombinasi Metode SAW dan ROC,” J. media Inform. budidarma, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 376–380, 2019.

M. Badaruddin, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Menerapkan Kombinasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) dengan Rank Order Centroid (ROC),” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 366–370, 2019.

S. Damanik and D. P. Utomo, “Implementasi Metode ROC (Rank Order Centroid) Dan Waspas Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kerjasama Vendor,” KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 4, no. 1, 2020.

I. Irwan, I. M. Pandiangan, and ..., “Penerapan Kombinasi Metode ROC dan TOPSIS Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Untuk Rekomendasi Promosi Jabatan,” JURIKOM (Jurnal …, vol. 4, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i1.2215.


Bila bermanfaat silahkan share artikel ini

Berikan Komentar Anda terhadap artikel Penerapan Metode MOOSRA dan ROC dalam Penentuan Guru Terbaik

Dimensions Badge

ARTICLE HISTORY

Submitted: 2023-04-17
Published: 2023-04-30

Abstract View: 184 times
PDF Download: 177 times

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)